The When Harry Met Sally research effect
is alive and well in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationship.
A new study, Benefit
of burden? Attraction in cross-sex friendship (PDF),
presents a study’s findings on heterosexual men and women’s experiences with
cross-sex “platonic” friendships.
But doesn’t it seem like sociological researchers
are always asking this question? They
are, and this time their answer is yes, platonic friendships are possible
if you’re a woman. But since a platonic male-female friendship requires both a
man and a woman, it seems their real answer is no.
The main study highlighted in the Scientific
American’s coverage of the research is one performed, not
surprisingly, on a college campus. Researchers brought in 88 pairs of
opposite-sex friends, separated them, then asked each participant questions
about their physical and romantic attraction to their friend and their
perception of how attracted their friend was to them. They used a 9 point
rating scale: 1 (not at all attracted), 5 (moderately attracted), and 9
(extremely attracted).
The full-text article, not some annoying abstract
or hyped-up press release, is available
online, which meant I actually looked at the numbers. The results of the
study aren’t especially surprising, but they are sort of funny. Men were more
likely to express sexual or physical attraction for their friend. Women tended
to view their male friends as, well, friends.
If you actually read the data, the differences
are statistically significant, but not insanely different. Men’s self-reported
attraction to their friend was a mean 4.94, while the mean for women was 3.97. Additionally, men tended believe that their female friends were more attracted
to them (mean 4.54) than they were. Whereas women tended to believe that their
male friends weren’t as physically attracted to them as they actually,
statistically, were (mean 4.25). Both sexes apparently projected their own
feelings of attraction onto their friend: women weren’t as attracted to their
male friends and thus they thought their male friends probably weren’t into
them either.
Though importantly, the men were more likely to
think their friend wanted to date them (a separate category from physical/sexual
attraction) than to actually want to date their lady friend themselves. When
the opposite-sex friend was already involved in a romantic relationship, women
were less likely to be sexually attracted to that friend and much less likely
to want to date them. However, when the woman was already partnered, men were
more likely to be sexually attracted to them and to want to date them, as
compared to the uncoupled women. Men, y’all conniving. More revelations after the cut....
Since every sex/relationship study ever seems to
be performed on poor, extra-credit-desperate undergraduates, it’s good that
this one included some non-collegiate participants. In the second part of their
study, researchers compared the results of “emerging adults”
(extra-credit-desperate undergraduates) with those of young/middle-aged adults
(over the age of twenty-three) on questions investigating the importance and
value of opposite-sex friendships. Women in both age groups were more likely to
cite “Fun/Laughter” as a reason they saw value in their opposite-sex friendships
than men were. Maybe because women
aren’t funny?
As participants got older, the discrepancy
between men and women valuing the possibility of romance with their opposite-sex
friend grew. In the older adults, ten percent of men valued “Sexual
Attraction/Mating Desires” in their friendship, while only one percent of women
did. So, ladies, that 40-year-old married man friend might have some ulterior
motives.
The authors of this study present a wealth of
well-trod evolutionary biological rationale to contextualize their research.
Remember, women have the babies and men are always looking for someone new to
make babies with. They contend that, “Our findings offer preliminary support
for the proposal that men’s and women’s experiences in
cross-sex friendships reflect their evolved mating strategies.” Evolutionary
biology is obviously important, but our genes don’t define our entire
experience. Viewing social experience through a restrictive, deterministic lens
doesn’t reveal the entire picture.
Our cultural expectations doubtlessly play an
important role: i.e. men are more likely to speculate that their opposite-sex
friends wants to date them than that the woman is sexually attracted to them.
But how different are these terms, really? And what does the statistic
difference reveal about how language reflects gender norms, while perhaps not
making an important distinction about reality? Most people who date also have
sex.
Based on the scale used in the study, most of the
results from men and women show that they are slightly less than “moderately”
attracted to their opposite-sex friend. But this makes sense. We choose our
friends because we like them. Because we think they’re fun and we have common
interests or experience. These are some of the very same reasons we choose to
become romantically involved with a partner. It would be weird if no one were
even slightly attracted to his or her friends. Maybe men and women have
different levels of comfort with the experience of being attracted to someone
but not acting on it. Maybe women are less likely to “admit” they’re sexually
attracted to their male friend, while men are traditionally quite culturally
comfortable asserting sexual attraction.
So while it’s possible to read the findings of
this study as another “men are egotistic and they want to sex everyone”
headline, I think it’s more complicated than that. The researchers are right
that we exist in an unprecedented time for human interaction. Never before have
so many men and women interacted, socially and in the workplace, in
professional and platonic ways. As gender lines break down in the office, men
and women are forced to forge new territory and re-imagine what it means to be
friends with those of the opposite sex. I think it’s becoming increasingly
possible to have real and meaningful friendships with those of the opposite
sex. But, then again, I’m a woman.
Culled from motherboard.vice.com by Kelly Bourdet
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please add your comment...